Student (De-identified)
Student C
Disability
ASD / Sensory Processing
Report Period
Q2 · Jan–Mar 2026
OT Provider
A. Demo-Test, COTA
Supervising OTR
L. Demo-Test, OTR/L
IEP Service Freq.
2x/week · 30 min · Direct + Consult
Annual Review Date
08/15/2026
Frameworks Applied
Sensory Integration & Praxis (Ayres) · Alert Program (Williams & Shellenberger) · Zones of Regulation (Kuypers) · Interoception Curriculum (Craig)
UTC IRB #2025-0084 · FERPA Compliant
1
OT Present Levels — Sensory Processing & Functional Performance
34 CFR §300.320(a)(1) · FAPE Functional Basis
◆
OT Evaluation Basis (Aug 2025): Sensory Profile-2 (SP-2) indicated significant differences in auditory sensitivity and sensory seeking behaviors. Evaluation identified voice volume dysregulation as a primary barrier to classroom participation and peer interaction. Brooks Band™ baseline data provides ongoing objective measurement of the functional behavior identified in the SP-2.
At Q2 baseline, Student C demonstrated difficulty modulating arousal and voice volume in response to environmental demands. Brooks Band™ monitoring across Q2 recorded an average of
11.8 voice regulation exceedances per 60-minute period, with exceedance duration averaging
9.6 seconds. Student showed limited interoceptive awareness — required adult naming of body state in
88% of dysregulation events at baseline. Behaviors associated with elevated arousal (increased motor activity, voice volume escalation) were most frequent during sensory-stimulating environments (cafeteria, gymnasium, transitions). These present levels directly limit Student C's ability to participate in group instruction and regulate behavior in the least restrictive environment.
Sensor data corroborates SP-2 findings · Functional baseline for OT goals · Graphable quarterly
2
OT Domains Measured This Quarter — SMART Goal Progress
IDEA Related Service · Must enable FAPE
Domain 1 · Arousal Regulation (Voice Volume)
Baseline exceedances/hr11.8
Week 7 exceedances/hr5.9
Baseline self-correct rate12%
Week 7 self-correct rate61%
Adult body-state prompt needed48% ↓ from 88%
Q2 Goal Criterion (60%)MET ✓
Domain 2 · Interoceptive Awareness
Self-id of "loud body" baseline1/5 trials
Self-id of "loud body" Week 73/5 trials
Uses Zones language unpromptedEmerging
Requests sensory break independently2/5 trials
Body-state labeling accuracy60%
Q2 Goal Criterion (50%)MET ✓
Domain 3 · Sensory Seeking / On-Task
Baseline on-task duration4.2 min
Week 7 on-task duration9.1 min
Fidget tool use effectivenessModerate
Transition dysregulation events/day3.1 ↓ from 5.8
Sensory break return-to-task ≤5min4/5 sessions
Q2 Goal (7 min on-task)MET ✓
Domain 4 · Classroom Participation
Peer interaction disruptions/hr2.4 ↓ from 6.1
Adult redirect frequency/hr1.8 ↓ from 7.2
Independent strategy use in Gen Ed3/5 observations
Teacher report: "manages better"Yes — all 7 wks
Inclusion time maintained100% of IEP minutes
LRE complianceMaintained ✓
3
Objective Weekly Data — Brooks Band™ Export (OT Use)
Sensory Integration · Alert Program · Interoception
Brooks Band™ OT Data Export · Student C · Q2 2026 Auto-generated · Jan 6 – Feb 28, 2026
| Week | Exceed/hr | Avg Duration |
Self-Correct | Body-State ID | On-Task (min) | Adult Redirects/hr |
| Baseline | 11.8 | 9.6s | 12% | 20% | 4.2 | 7.2 |
| Wk 1 | 10.9 | 8.8s | 22% | 30% | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| Wk 2 | 9.7 | 8.1s | 31% | 35% | 6.0 | 5.8 |
| Wk 3 | 8.8 | 7.2s | 40% | 42% | 6.9 | 4.9 |
| Wk 4 | 7.9 | 6.5s | 48% | 50% | 7.8 | 3.8 |
| Wk 5 | 7.1 | 5.9s | 54% | 55% | 8.4 | 2.9 |
| Wk 6 | 6.4 | 5.2s | 58% | 58% | 8.8 | 2.3 |
| Wk 7 | 5.9 | 4.6s | 61% | 60% | 9.1 | 1.8 |
4
OT Clinical Narrative & Sensory Diet Recommendations
§300.324(b) · FAPE Basis
Student C demonstrated measurable progress across all four OT domains this quarter. Voice arousal regulation (as measured by Brooks Band™) improved from a baseline self-correction rate of 12% to 61% — with exceedances per hour declining from 11.8 to 5.9, directly supporting increased classroom participation. Interoceptive awareness showed meaningful development: body-state identification accuracy rose from 20% to 60%, meeting the Q2 criterion of 50%. Student is beginning to use Zones language unprompted in approximately 40% of dysregulation events.
On-task duration increased from 4.2 to 9.1 minutes, exceeding the Q2 criterion of 7 minutes. Adult redirects declined from 7.2 to 1.8 per hour — a 75% reduction — indicating that sensory regulation support is generalizing to the classroom without ongoing adult mediation.
Sensory diet update for Q3: Add proprioceptive input protocol at transitions (wall push-ups, resistance band at chair). Continue vibrotactile feedback via Brooks Band™ as primary self-monitoring cue. Introduce self-selected sensory break requesting with visual menu. Goal: independent strategy use in 4/5 classroom observations by end of Q3.
5
OT Team Recommendations & IEP Implications
§300.320(a)(4) · Supplementary Aids & Services
IEP Goal Status
All 3 Q2 OT Objectives Met
Domains 1–3 criteria achieved. Recommend advancing Q3 criteria. No goal revision required at annual review if trajectory continues.
Supplementary Aids (IEP §(a)(4))
Brooks Band™ wearable documented as supplementary aid. Recommend formalizing in IEP as assistive technology support for self-regulation. Enables reduction in 1:1 paraprofessional prompting.
LRE & Inclusion Impact
All inclusion minutes maintained. Peer interaction disruptions reduced 61%. Student is increasingly able to access general education without adult mediation — directly supporting LRE compliance and FAPE.
Supervising OTR Review
L. Demo-Test, OTR/L reviewed all Q2 session notes and Brooks Band™ data exports. COTA services confirmed appropriate and consistent with OTR treatment plan. No modifications to service model required.
COTA (Direct Service Provider)
A. Demo-Test, COTA · Date: ___________
Supervising OTR/L
L. Demo-Test, OTR/L · Date: ___________
SpEd Director / IEP Review
________________________